aim
a broad statement on what will be tested
hypothesis
a prediction that is precise and can be tested
simple hypothesis
predicts the relationship between the two variables
what is an example of a simple hypothesis
students perform better after they have eaten compared to when they are hungry
operationalised hypothesis
has to be written in a measurable and testable form. it can't be ambiguous
what is an example of a operationalised hypothesis
Students who take a 20 mins maths test 30 mins after lunch will get more marks out of 20 than students completing the test 30 mins before lunch
independent variable
the thing the researcher manipulates or changes
dependent variable
this is the thing the researcher measures
pilot study
a small study carried out to test the feasibility of a larger one
confederants
they are not a participant. they are playing a role
why do people do a pilot study?
check the tasks aren't too easy
what are the four types of hypotheses?
alternative, null, directional, non-directional
alternative hypothesis
prediction of what will happen to the DV when the IV changes and any observed differences will be due to chance
null hypothesis
states that the IV will have no effect on the DV and any observed differences will be due to chance
non-directional hypothesis
predicts that there will be a difference between two conditions or groups of participants without stating which one is better
directional hypothesis
states which group is better of the predicted differences between the two groups
why would you chose a non-directional hypothesis?
chosen when there is no previous research or lots of controversy
why would you chose a directional hypothesis?
when previous research implies a pattern of findings
what are extraneous variables
variables which must be eliminated or controlled otherwise they may affect the dependent variable
what are situational variables
these are variables to do with the situation and affect the behaviour of participants
what is an example of situational variables
time of day, lighting
what are participant variables
variables to do with the participants
what is an example of a participant variable
age, gender, social class, ethnicity
what are confounding variables
extraneiys variables which have not be cobtrilled abd may affect the results
what are demand characteristics
an aspect of the research situation which leads to the participant to guess the aim and change their behaviour accordingly
what are two ways to control demand characteristics
deception and the single blind method
what are investigator effects
anything the researcher does which can affect how the participant behaves and the subsequent data collected
how do you control investigator effects
double-blind method
what is the single blind method
this is when participants are not told which condition they are in
what is the double blind method
neither the researcher or the participant know about the hypothesis or which condition they are in
ethics
it is concerned with what is deemed acceptable
main ethical issues
consent, deception, confidentiality, debriefing, withdrawal, protection from harm
what is the mnemonic to remember the main ethical issues
can do can't do with participants
observational research
gathering primary data by observing relevant people, actions, and situations
consent
permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
deception
misleading participants about the true purpose of a study or the events that will actually transpire
confidentiality
respecting and protecting the participants privacy and identity
debriefing
researcher have to speak to all participants at the end of the study and explain the study
withdrawal
all participants must be informed that they can drop out of a study at any time up to a certain date before publicity and how to do this
protection from harm
researchers must not cause distress to patients and they must be protected from both physical and mental harm
3 ways to gain consent
presumption consent, prior general consent, retrospective consent
presumption consent
asking a similar pool of people to the actual participants if they would be happy to participate and then assume that the real participants would be happy to
prior general consent
participants give their permission to take part in a number of different studies- including one that will involve deception. by consenting, participants are effectively consenting to be deceived
retrospective consent
get permission after the study
what are the two approaches
biological and behaviourist
quantitative data
numerical data
qualitative data
descriptive data
when would you use quantitative data
in experimental based research methods
when would you use qualitative data
in case studies, unstructured observations and interviews
3 measures of central tendency
mean, median, mode
mean
the statistical average
median
the middle number
mode
most frequent value
:) mean
uses all values so most sensitive measure
:( mean
can be distorted by anomalies
:) median
unaffected by extreme values
:( median
only takes into account 1 or 2 scores
:) mode
unaffected by extreme values
:( mode
not useful in small data sets
standard deviation
measure of the distribution on scores. the larger the standard deviation the larger the distribution of scores
calculate percentage change
change/original x 100
extraneous variables
any variables other than the independent variable that seem likely to influence the DV in a specific study
participant variables
characteristics such as age, gender, and intelligence that vary from one individual to another
how can we control participant variables
randomly allocating participants to groups so any difference cancel eachother out with a large sample
situational variables
features in the environment that may interfere with behaviour of participants such as time of day, lighting, temperature
how can we control situational variables
using standardised procedures and instructions so participants have the same experience
confounding variables
extraneous variables that haven't been controlled
demand characteristics
an aspect of the research that leads participants to guess the aim and to change their behaviour
investigator effects
the researcher does something which can affect how the participant behaves and the data colected
reliability
consistency of measurement
validity
the extent to which a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to
lab experiment
higly controlled environement
strength of lab experiment
high validity, high reliability
weakness of lab experiment
low ecological validity, bias from demand characteristics
field experiment
A type of experiment where the IV is manipulated and the DV is measured that takes place in a more natural setting
strength of field experiment
higher ecological validity, less bias from demand charcteristics
weakness of field experiment
lees control= more extraneous variables, low reliability
natural experiment
A type of experiment where the IV is a naturally occurring event and cannot be controlled.
quasi experiment
A type of experiment where the IV is an existing difference between people
strength of natural/quasi experiment
greatest ecological validity/ less bias from demand characteristics
weakness of natural/quasi experiment
hard to eliminate extraneous variables/ low reliability
independent groups design
an experimental design where participants are split into two groups and each group takes part in one condition.
repeated groups design
an experimental design where all participants complete both conditions. Counterbalancing may be used to eliminate order effects.
matched pairs design
an experimental design where each participant is matched up with another participant who matches them on particular characteristics. Results are compared.
open questions
allows participants to respond in their own words
closed questions
participants chose their response from a limited number of fixed responses
advantages of closed questions
easy to analyse as quantitative data
advantages of open questions
provides rich detailed data as qualitative data
disadvantages of open questions
hard to statistically analyse
disadvantages of closed questions
losses the richness of people questions