1.4:government intervention

-Level of info the govt has (if the gov KNOWS how much pollution is allowed and its accurate,the policy will be more efficient & vice versa)//hard to know how many permits to set -if not enough firms can reduce pollution then the price for permits will increase and businesses will incur more costs -need for international co-operation -firms may pass permit price onto consumer externalities

-magnitude -difficult to set tax as there is conflict in raising revenue and saving externally -may create a black market -regressive and therefore can exemplify inequality -depends on PED

-internalises externality and this maximises social welfare -raises gov revenue which can be used to solve externalities in different ways

-society reaches social optimum and welfare is maximised -has other positive impacts eg.encourages small businesses

-high opportunity cost -difficult to target as exact size of externality in production is unknown -can become inefficient if in place for a long time, -difficult to remove therefore gov loses lots of money

-if set at MSB=MSC the they can help externalities by increasing welfare -A minimum price will ensure that goods are affordable, whilst a maximum price will ensure that producers get a fair price. Both of these are able to ​reduce poverty ​and can increase equity/equality.

-distortion of price signals which causes excess supply/demand, -difficult to know where to set prices, -can lead to creation of black markets

-corrects market failure -equality for essential goods and services -benefits of providing the good eg.if the gov provides healthcare it increases no of healthy workforce which increases supply

-expensive,high opportunity cost -may breed government production inefficiency as there will be no incentive for the production of goods -may suffer from corruption -may produce wrong no of goods eg. hospital beds may not be enough

-heps consumers to act rationally(maximise utility, corrects market failure) -shifts demand to social optimum, welfare maximised

costs lots for gov no guarantee of success-consumers may not listen and act irrationally

-hard touch intervention, consumers can't do anything but listen and this guarantees success In behaviour -solves market failure and maximises social welfare

-monitoring costs -regulatory capture -firms may pass on costs

-excessive administration costs -distortion of price signals -unintended consequences -info gaps

-Level of info the govt has (if the gov KNOWS how much pollution is allowed and its accurate,the policy will be more efficient & vice versa)//hard to know how many permits to set -if not enough firms can reduce pollution then the price for permits will increase and businesses will incur more costs -need for international co-operation -firms may pass permit price onto consumer

-magnitude of external costs/the magnitude of the externality -imperfect knowledge -difficulty of obtaining government intervention -->risk of government failure -time lag

-magnitude -difficult to set tax as there is conflict in raising revenue and saving externally -may create a black market -regressive and therefore can exemplify inequality -depends on PED

-internalises externality and this maximises social welfare -raises gov revenue which can be used to solve externalities in different ways

-society reaches social optimum and welfare is maximised -has other positive impacts eg.encourages small businesses

-high opportunity cost -difficult to target as exact size of externality in production is unknown -can become inefficient if in place for a long time, -difficult to remove therefore gov loses lots of money

-if set at MSB=MSC the they can help externalities by increasing welfare -A minimum price will ensure that goods are affordable, whilst a maximum price will ensure that producers get a fair price. Both of these are able to ​reduce poverty ​and can increase equity/equality.

-distortion of price signals which causes excess supply/demand, -difficult to know where to set prices, -can lead to creation of black markets

-corrects market failure -equality for essential goods and services -benefits of providing the good eg.if the gov provides healthcare it increases no of healthy workforce which increases supply

-expensive,high opportunity cost -may breed government production inefficiency as there will be no incentive for the production of goods -may suffer from corruption -may produce wrong no of goods eg. hospital beds may not be enough

-heps consumers to act rationally(maximise utility, corrects market failure) -shifts demand to social optimum, welfare maximised

costs lots for gov no guarantee of success-consumers may not listen and act irrationally

-hard touch intervention, consumers can't do anything but listen and this guarantees success In behaviour -solves market failure and maximises social welfare

-monitoring costs -regulatory capture -firms may pass on costs

-excessive administration costs -distortion of price signals -unintended consequences -info gaps