Scientifically backed study method
Review terms and definitions
Study with MC, T/F, and other questions
Take a test on your terms and definitions
no self-incrimination (right to remain silent)
right to a lawyer, an impartial jury, and a speedy trial - due process of the law - fair procedures
Kolender
The Supreme court ruled that the law that "gave police the power to ask for the ID if there was reasonable suspicion that a law had been violated", was too vague, and needed to be changed. based off the case of a man refusing to present ID after constantly walking around
Frank Schaefer
officiated his son’s same-sex wedding - important gay equality case
Gideon v Wainwright
overturned Betts v Brady - Gideon was denied a court appointed attorney, this case set precedent as insuring the 6th amendment
Nixon v U.S.
Nixon was impeached by the Senate for having lied to the Grand Jury, he then argued that this was unconstitutional but the fact that in the constitution it is stated that all impeachment trials are up to the Senate to deal - unanimously voted in favor of the US
The power of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional - they can review something even with existing precedent (Marbury v Madison)
1st Degree Murder
taking a life with premeditation, deliberation and malice; 25-life in prison
2nd degree murder
voluntarily taking a life without premeditation; 15-life in prison
Voluntary Manslaughter
voluntarily taking another person’s life without premeditation and with “mitigating circumstances”; 2.4, or 6 years in state prison
Involuntary Manslaughter
(an exception to murder) Taking another person’s life through reckless behavior or action (not involving a car); 2, 3, or 4 years in state prison
Negligent Homicide
due to reckless behavior
Felony Murder
killing while committing a felony, usually considered 1st degree
Prostitution
paying for sex
Plea Bargain
The defendant will say that they are guilty for a lesser sentence - sometimes they also may have to give evidence or testify as part of the plea deal
Grand Jury
a group of people who vote not on the guilt of the accused, but if the evidence is sufficient to bring charges against them - prosecutor brings evidence, the grand jury then decides if it’s sufficient
Juris Prudence
The idea of law
Ex post facto
New laws cannot apply to people who did something before that law was passed
Habeas Corpus
Asking whether a detention of someone is legal and allowed
Due Process
A state must respect all legal rights of all parties and citizens
Subpoena
A written order to bring someone into court to testify
Mayhem
unlawful and maliciously depriving another person (or rendering useless) a part of their body
Uttering
offering to someone as a genuine document known to be fake
Conspiracy
an agreement between two or more persons (including some positive steps) to commit a crime
Insanity Defense
someone doesn’t know that what they’re doing is wrong because they aren’t mentally capable of understanding why what they did was wrong
Alibi
Some type of evidence that shows that someone wasn’t in the place they were alleged to be, or that they cannot have been in a spot that they are accused to have been at
Justifiable Defenses
Any argument that someone shouldn’t be considered guilty not because they didn’t commit the crime, but because they had a reason to not be considered at fault