electoral college
538 electors (number of representatives and senators + 3 electoral votes for DC)
electors nominated by party and chosen based on state’s popular vote
votes in december
candidate must obtain 270 electoral votes to win
the proportional plan
keep current plan but gets rid of winner take all
ec votes divided based on percentage of popular vote
allows for third parties to obtain electoral votes
the district plan
break the number of ec votes by each congressional district
2 remaining ec votes assigned to the winner of the popular vote
system maine and nebraska have currently
the national popular vote plan
states pledge to give each electoral vote to the winner of the popular vote
all states MUST adopt this plan for it to work
the national bonus plan
ec vote increases by 102 votes (2 votes per state and DC)
winner of national popular vote receives these 102
candidate needs 321 votes to win
winner-take-all system
the candidate who wins the majority in each state wins all of that state’s electoral votes
voter demographics
class
race
religion
age
location they live in
education
gender
rational-choice voting
based on what is in citizen’s best interest
retrospective voting
based on how candidate or party performed in recent past
prospective voting
based on how you think candidate or party will perform in the future
party-line voting
voting clearly along party lines for all offices
primaries
open: voter may choose to participate in either primary, regardless of party
closed: voter must be registered with party to vote in primary
caucuses
public meeting run by political party to select winning candidate (only really invested people go)
campaign finance
all money raised to support electoral candidates issues, parties, etc
hard money
regulated money contributed directly to candidates (individual limit→$3300 per candidate per election cycle)
traditional pac-may contribute $5000 to individual candidate(s)
soft money
spent on party activities, looser restrictions
super pacs-spend as much as they want, but can’t donate DIRECTLY to candidate or party
citizens united v. fec
argued the bipartisan campaign reform act’s regulations violate the 1st amendment, since this corporation wanted to make a film about whether Hilary Clinton would make a good president
ruled corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections can’t be limited
bipartisan campaign reform act
law amending the federal election campaign act of 1971, regulates financing of political campaigns
perception of the media
negative → sources are unregulated (esp social media), biased, and untrustworthy
interest groups
an organized group of citizens whose goal is to shape public policy towards a particular end
voting rights amendments/laws
15th - no restrictions on race
19th - no restrictions on gender
23rd - dc residents can vote in presidential elections
24th - poll taxes removed
26th - establishes set age of 18
voting rights act of 1965 - abolished literary tests and other barriers not allowing non-white people to vote
political efficacy
the sense that citizens have the capacity to understand and influence political events
linkage institutions
connect citizens to the government
horse race journalism
focus on polls, highlighting who is ahead rather than key issues
sound bites
short clips of someone speaking, only lasting a matter of seconds
ideological parties
based on comprehensive set of beliefs, like the major parties (ex. libertarian or green parties)
single issue parties
focused on one policy matter (ex. right to life party)
economic protest parties
rooted in periods of economic discontent (ex. greenback party → wanted paper money)
splinter/factional parties
party split from major party (ex. progressive “bull moose” party
impact of social media on politics
increase selective attention- people listen to sources that say what they want to hear
algorithms ensure people only hear one side of the political issues (depending on what they like/click on)
increase in less professionalism in how candidates communicate with citizens (think of trump’s twitter)
federalist 70
argument for a strong executive leader, since energy in the executive is essential, as it protects the community from foreign attacks, steadily administers laws, protects property, and secures liberty and justice.
single executive → safer, less difference in opinions will weaken respect and authority and can be watched closer by the people
federalist 51
checks and balances are necessary to control abuse by the government → the people must govern the government to ensure leaders take accountability
each branch’s power checks that of the others and each is dependent on the people who provide legitimate authority → government can check the power of factions
checks and balances preserve liberty by ensuring justice
article II of us constitution
executive power → president
4 year terms
natural born citizen
35 years old
14 years residency
powers
make treaties (if 2/3 of senate concur)
nominate and appoint people to office (advice and consent of senate)
state of union
commander in chief
requires opinion of leaders of departments
set up electoral college
vice president-takes over if president dies or can’t be in office
president, vice president, and civil officers can be removed on impeachment for treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors