Ecology - Mod 11 (Ch 12): Predation and Herbivory

studied byStudied by 61 people
5.0(2)
get a hint
hint

predator

1 / 25

26 Terms

1

predator

an organism that catches individuals (prey), kills, and consumes them —> removes individuals from the prey population

New cards
2

herbivore

definition 1) an organism that primarily eats plant material

definition 2) an organism that eats parts of living plants, including tissues or internal fluids, but does not outright kill it

New cards
3

parasite

an organism that consumes parts of a living prey organism (host) in/on which it loves

New cards
4

predator/prey size differences

predators usually larger than prey because large prey may be impossible, dangerous, or energy-costly to subdue and consume

when predators are smaller than prey, can compensate using packs, schools, persistence

New cards
5

adaptations to avoid herbivory

structural defenses (e.g. spines, hairs, tough seed coats)

production of sticky gums and resins (special case: red-cockaded woodpeckers)

production of toxic compounds (e.g. tannins, interfere with digestion of all proteins; other compounds that affect specific metabolic pathways or physiological processes)

masting (synchronized mass fruit/seed production at irregular intervals)

New cards
6

special case: red-cockaded woodpecker

only woodpecker to build nests in live pines

sticky resin of live pines traps insects for woodpeckers to eat

New cards
7

masting

synchronized mass fruit/seed production at irregular intervals

may have evolved to prevent predator satiation (too many to eat them all, not reliable enough to build predator population numbers, not reliable for seed predators to specialize)

other possible reason it evolved: pollination efficiency (optimizes successful pollination and fertilization; especially important for wind-pollinated species)

New cards
8

adaptations to tolerate herbivory

compensation to reduce effects (compensation = increased growth upon removal of tissues)

clipping, in some plants (herbivory → decreased self shading → increased growth → growth of previously dormant axillary buds

New cards
9

adaptations to avoid predation

structural defenses (e.g. armor plates on armadillo, armadillo girdled lizard, spines on catfish, hedgehog, porcupine)

chemical defenses (e.g. poison, venom, foul smell)

behavioral defenses (e.g. running, early detection, seeking refuge, sacrificing body parts to either escape grip or use as a distraction, appearing larger to intimidate, expelling blood/urine/vomit/feces, feigning death, crypsis, aposematic coloration)

New cards
10

aposematic coloration

certain coloring or marking (usually bright) to warn potential predators that you are bad-tasting, toxic, or dangerous

predators avoid such animals innately or due to learned response after an unpleasant experience

some animals manufacture chemicals, others get them from other plants

types: Mullerian mimicry, Batesian mimicry

types of Batesian mimicry: morphological, behavioral

New cards
11

Mullerian mimicry

noxious species evolve to resemble each other

e.g. monarch, viceroy, and queen butterfly

e.g. British bumblebees

New cards
12

Batesian mimicry

harmless species resemble noxious species

e.g. milk snake vs coral snake

New cards
13

morphological Batesian mimicry

something looks harmful or dangerous but isn’t

e.g. the tip of a leaf is red and looks like a thorn, but isn’t

New cards
14

behavioral Batesian mimicry

a harmless species acts like a noxious species

e.g. speckled rattlesnake, spotted leafnose snake, black racer (shakes tail in leaves)

New cards
15

example: costs of avoiding predators

presence of predators (fish or dragonfly larva) affecting prey (tadpole)

when tadpoles spent a lot of time avoiding predators, their growth rate decreased

see figure 12.10 in text

New cards
16

adaptations to improve predation

camouflage (e.g. spider blending in with flower, cheetah, octopus)

speed (e.g. cheetah)

weapons (e.g. fangs, claws)

keen senses (e.g. owl eyes, snake nose)

New cards
17

example: costs to adaptations improving predation

newts have toxins in skin, but some snakes are resistant

resistant snakes may be immobilized for hours

toxicity and resistance vary between populations

populations with snakes more resistant to toxin move slower

New cards
18

coevolution

a series of reciprocal evolutionary adaptations in 2 species

e.g. Heliconius and passion flowers

Heliconius lays eggs on passionflowers, caterpillars feed on sleeves

flower produces a toxin, caterpillars become resistant to toxin

flower produces sugar deposits that attract ants/wasps that prey on butterfly and mimic eggs so it won’t lay more eggs

New cards
19

oscillation

repetitive variation in magnitude around a central point or between two different states

populations that oscillate typically exceed carrying capacity and then fall well below K with relatively regular periodicity

may be caused by predator-prey interactions

New cards
20

predator-prey cycles

often cycle at similar frequencies, with predators slightly lagging behind due to delayed density dependence

e.g. small herbivores and their predators have cycles of 4 years, larger herbivores and their predators have cycles of 9-10 years in Canada

predators eat prey, reduce prey numbers

predators go hungry, predator numbers drop

remaining prey survive better, prey numbers build

predator populations build as prey increases

<p>often cycle at similar frequencies, with predators slightly lagging behind due to delayed density dependence</p><p>e.g. small herbivores and their predators have cycles of 4 years, larger herbivores and their predators have cycles of 9-10 years in Canada</p><p>predators eat prey, reduce prey numbers</p><p>predators go hungry, predator numbers drop</p><p>remaining prey survive better, prey numbers build</p><p>predator populations build as prey increases</p>
New cards
21

example: lab investigation of predators and prey dynamics

G.F. Gause

Paramecium and Didinium in an enclosure, with and without refuge

without refuge: predator devoured all prey, then went extinct itself

with refuge: some prey escaped predation, then prey population reexpanded after the predator went extinct

could maintain predator-prey cycles by periodically adding more predators (i.e. immigration)

see figures 12.15 and 12.16

New cards
22

Lotka-Volterra model of prey population

modification of exponential growth formula

without predation, prey population will grow exponentially

dN/dt = rate of change in prey population

rN = exponential growth in absence of predators

aNP = amount that predation reduces the growth rate of the prey population (i.e. how many prey are removed from the population by predators)

N = # of prey (more prey = easier to catch)

r = prey’s per capita exponential growth rate

P = # of predators (more predators = more prey caught)

a = efficiency of predation (more efficient predators = more prey caught)

<p>modification of exponential growth formula</p><p>without predation, prey population will grow exponentially</p><p>dN/dt = rate of change in prey population</p><p>rN = exponential growth in absence of predators</p><p>aNP = amount that predation reduces the growth rate of the prey population (i.e. how many prey are removed from the population by predators)</p><p>N = # of prey (more prey = easier to catch)</p><p>r = prey’s per capita exponential growth rate</p><p>P = # of predators (more predators = more prey caught)</p><p>a = efficiency of predation (more efficient predators = more prey caught)</p>
New cards
23

Lotka-Volterra model: predator population

dP/dt = rate of change in predator population

f = conversion of prey to predator population growth (efficiency of converting food (consumed prey) to population growth)

aNP = removal of prey by predators

mP = death (mortality) rate of predators regardless of prey availability

P = # of predators

N = # of prey

a = constant expressing efficiency of predation

m = constant related to death of predators

<p>dP/dt = rate of change in predator population</p><p>f =  conversion of prey to predator population growth (efficiency of converting food (consumed prey) to population growth)</p><p>aNP = removal of prey by predators</p><p>mP = death (mortality) rate of predators regardless of prey availability</p><p>P = # of predators</p><p>N = # of prey</p><p>a = constant expressing efficiency of predation</p><p>m = constant related to death of predators</p>
New cards
24

zero growth isoclines

conditions required for a population size to stay constant

(i.e. dN/dt = 0 or dP/dt = 0)

prey: dN/dt = rN - aNP = 0 when P = r/a (r/a = # of predators causing the prey population to stay constant)

predators: dP/dt = faNP - mP = 0 when N = m/fa (m/fa = # of prey causing the predator population to stay constant)

New cards
25

Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model oscillations

changes in P and N are represented by vectors, combined into a single vector within quadrants

the vector in each quadrant corresponds to a region on a population cycle graph

predator population cycles lag slightly behind prey population

further population sizes are from equilibrium —> larger amplitude of cycles —> less likely to return to stability

<p>changes in P and N are represented by vectors, combined into a single vector within quadrants</p><p>the vector in each quadrant corresponds to a region on a population cycle graph</p><p>predator population cycles lag slightly behind prey population</p><p>further population sizes are from equilibrium —&gt; larger amplitude of cycles —&gt; less likely to return to stability</p>
New cards
26

problem with Lotka-Volterra model

the model assumes that there is a lack of satiation of predators

i.e. predators never get full

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 27 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13487 people
Updated ... ago
4.9 Stars(60)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard117 terms
studied byStudied by 1 person
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard44 terms
studied byStudied by 3 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard160 terms
studied byStudied by 15 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard42 terms
studied byStudied by 3 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard92 terms
studied byStudied by 105 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(3)
flashcards Flashcard30 terms
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard59 terms
studied byStudied by 1 person
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard53 terms
studied byStudied by 28 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)